"I need feminism because… There are more MPs called Dave than female MPs"
Yeah. Fuck you, Dave.
How dare you study politics and take an interest in leadership roles. What a selfish bastard you are, for pursuing a career that supports your country and keeps it from descending into anarchy. Fuck you, Dave, because it is entirely your fault that women aren’t as inclined to pursue leadership roles like being a Member of Parliament.
Women want more representation in politics, but none of them actually want to take on the responsibility of representation themselves; they want someone else to do it for them.
"Too many men," they say. "There are just too many Daves. This isn’t fair."
Newsflash, Dave, you are a man. You are solely responsible for women avoiding politics. There are too many of you. Whatever you do, Dave, it means shit. No one is going to look up to you. Who gives a damn about your leadership skills, your integrity or honesty? You won’t ever be an inspiration or motivation for women pursuing politics, simply because you don’t have a vagina between your legs. As we all know, women only respect and admire other women.
Holy shit, Dave, you didn’t think about that, did you?
It was a fucking statistic stating that there are more men named Dave alone that are mp’s than woman as a whole population of mp’s. She didn’t attack the mp’s personally. Or Dave. I assure you. There isn’t enough support for young women. I also happened to notice that you were defending the pride of one of these “Dave’s”. She’s defending the rights of all those women. Dave will not be dishonorably discharged, because women are offered more positions. I literally cannot even offer enough f a reason as to why this is fine. She needs feminism, because maybe she wants to be a strong independent human. She’s not fucking victimizing the population of Dave’s. She just fucking said there’s more of those than women. I cannot even grasp how a man could find this offensive or oppressive to men. She literally stated a fact. Said she needed feminism. There’s an organized group endorsement on the paper. You are literally acting as if the existence of more women as MP’s would depreciate the value of men or some other convoluted idea. You’re assuming more women means less men, because you think she’s thinking more women- less men… When in reality she’s just saying more women. She just fucking used a statistic and you freaked out like an absolute ass potato.